So What Is This New Project Discovery?


Now that I’m finally over the Fanfest hangover, I can talk more about what was, for me, one of the most exciting presentations of the event: the new director for the citizen science program, Project Discovery. CCP announced back in February that they were planning on a new mission for the Project after the huge success of the recent biology mission identifying protein distribution in human cells.

The next mission capsuleers will be tasked with is all about exploration, a subject I’m sure many of you are familiar with. Only it’s all about finding exoplanets, which, as anyone who knows me can tell you, is my favourite thing! As an astrobiologist, its the closest thing to real life Star Trek that you can get.

Before I get to the part as to how we do it, lets have a little of the why you should be getting involved and helping us. Just yesterday, NASA announced confirmation of the composition of Saturn’s moon Enceladus’ plumes by the Cassini mission. The chemicals found are exactly what we were hoping for; chemicals that life as we know it can feed from. This confirmation strongly points to the same processes occurring on all of the icy worlds of our Solar System. Think about that for a second. Even Pluto?

We once thought oceans made our planet unique, but we’re now coming to realize that ‘ocean worlds’ are all around us.

Credits: NASA

Even Earth has a subsurface ocean. Our planet even had a liquid ocean a mere 100 million years after its formation. So did Mars, which may well have its own subsurface ocean. Any of you who read my regular columns know that we astrobiologists use our scientific dowsing rods to hunt for water all the time! There’s a lot of it, after all hydrogen is the most abundant molecule around; stars, or any of us, wouldn’t exist without it. Oxygen and the other elements that life needs are formed via stellar nucleosynthesis when stars die.

This graphic illustrates how Cassini scientists think water interacts with rock at the bottom of the ocean of Saturn’s icy moon Enceladus, producing hydrogen gas.

Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Cassini was never designed to look for life, but it gave us clues, so we definitely need a closer look. The above graphic relates to the black smokers we have on Earth. The current thinking in the science community is that this may well be how life started on our planet. Earth did not start out a friendly place to us, the atmosphere began much like my lungs felt Sunday morning after Fanfest ended. Early life liked methane, sulfur and the start of your worst hangover.

I can hear you ask, ‘So what does that have to do with Project Discovery Exoplanets?’ Excellent question! First, find your planet. As to how we look for them is well covered in Michel Mayor’s fanfest prestentation. He’s a fantastic scientist with his team including Didier Queloz. I had the great privilege of studying with them several years ago, I certainly hope that they inspired you as much as it inspired me. I do know that I saw some people trying to absorb a load of technical hard science a little too fast after the Pub Crawl. I will do my best to make it less confusing.

He mentioned Doppler spectroscopy, or the radial velocity method which is how the Geneva team discovered 51 Pegasi, the first confirmed exoplanet back in 1995. This method can establish a planet’s minimum mass as it peturbates the movement of its host star. Everything wobbles gravitationally through blue and redshifts which we can pick up.

Credit: Geneva University

There’s a great story to read around the discovery of this planet by the Pale Red Dot team if your mind isn’t mush already.

Transit photometry is the other way we look for exoplanets, it relies on the line of sight detection of a dip in the light emitted from the star it orbits, or a ‘light curve’ as we call it. This method can tell us a lot about a planet’s mass and what may be in its atmosphere. I hope you’re seeing where I’m going here. Ideally, you have an instrument that can measure a planet’s transit, and another that can measure its radial velocity. That way we have its mass, radius and atmosmpheric composition. With the upcoming James Webb Space Telescope and the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satelitte, we’re getting there.

The methods you will have available for Project Discovery will be to pick through data from the Kelper telescope and see if you can see anything that looks interesting. Those ‘interesting things’, we may be able to peek into its atmosphere and perhaps catch a glimpse of the life supporting chemicals that have been found on a moon in our Solar system. I know what I personally want to find…that exomoon, the one that looks like Enceladus. As for tips? Its easier to see a small planet transiting a red dwarf than around a large star, its easier to see a hot Jupiter transiting any star! Start there. Get to work capsuleers! I’d love you to share your findings with us. Happy hunting!

Let your voice be heard! Submit your own article to Imperium News here!

Would you like to join the Imperium News staff? Find out how!


  • Satan_is_our_only_true:_Savior

    So basically we’ll get paid to stare into the sun..

    April 17, 2017 at 8:08 AM
  • Yo dog, now you can explore the universe while you are exploring the universe by exploring the universe! #spacepopeapproved

    April 17, 2017 at 2:39 PM
  • Pew Pew

    In the presentation he talks about how most discovered gas giants are bigger than jupiter, and no one knows how to explain that.

    Is a combination of metallicity and temperature not enough? If a system has low metallicity (it is almost completely composed of hydrogen and helium) and it’s gas giant is very hot then it will be very big.

    If a system has high metallicity (it has lots of heavy elements in it which would lead to a gas giant having a rocky core) and it’s gas giant is far from the sun and therefore cold it’s gas giant will be smaller.

    For example in our system Jupiter has high metallicity and is quite far from the sun which would presumably make it quite small.

    Is there more variation than could be explained by these two factors?

    Is there a sample bias whereby smaller planets (especially those farther from the sun) are harder to detect so those which are detected will tend to be the large ones?

    If being close to the sun makes you hotter and that makes you bigger then surely there will be a big sample bias. Close means hot which means big which means very easy to see. Far means cold which means small which means hard to see.

    April 17, 2017 at 11:12 PM