‘Banks’ comes to Stellaris in 2017, brings ethics revamp, unity and ascension perks

Quendan 2017-01-13

With the holidays now more or less far behind me, I am still in recovery from Stellaris’ Kennedy update. Paradox’ games have always had an addictive quality to me that comes in spurts. Every time an update is released, I cannot wait to discover the new mechanics and intricacies that are added to the game. When I last wrote about Stellaris, the Leviathans story pack was just about to hit the virtual shelves. In the meantime, Kennedy was released on December 5 and brought with it a host of bug fixes and minor tweaks to the game mechanics. Patch 1.5, named after the late Iain M. Banks, will be accompanied by the game’s as-of-yet unnamed first expansion. Though the game’s director Martin Anward does tease that the upcoming features might have something to do with the works of the patch’s namesake author, whose worlds feature near-subliminal alien civilisations, intelligent machines, intricate spy games and a host of other Utopian ideas.

Judging from the most recent developer diaries, the Banks update will breathe some new life into the internal workings of your empire. Namely, ethics will see a rework. Ethics are crucial in determining the playstyle and government forms of your empire and its pops, the small population units that make or break your planets. While the individualist/collectivist government ethics-pair will be revamped into an egalitarian/authoritarian pair with as of yet unknown bonuses, the more interesting change is to population ethics. According to the developer diary:

  • Each pop in your empire will now only embrace a single, non-fanatic ethic. At the start of the game, your population will be made of up of only the ethics that you picked in species setup, but as your empire grows, its population will become more diverse in their views and wants.
  • Each ethic now has an attraction value for each pop in your empire depending on both the empire’s situation and their own situation. For example, enslaved pops tend to become more egalitarian, while pops living around non-enslaved aliens become more xenophilic (and pops living around enslaved aliens more xenophobic). Conversely, fighting a lot of wars will increase the attraction for militarism across your entire empire, while an alien empire purging pops of a particular species will massively increase the attraction for xenophobic for the species being purged.

This combines well with the changes to the faction system. Until now, factions were mainly rebel groups that you controlled by purges or stationing armies on the affected planets. There was little depth or reason to engage with factions, and dealing with them is considered by many one of the more arduous tasks of the game. This is about to change:

  • Factions are no longer purely rebel groupings, but instead represent political parties, popular movements and other such interest groups, and mostly only consist of pops of certain ethics. For example, the Supremacist faction desires complete political dominance for their own species, and is made up exclusively of Xenophobic pops, while the Isolationist faction wants diplomatic isolation and a strong defence, and can be joined by both Pacifist and Xenophobe pops. You do not start the game with any factions, but rather they will form over the course of the game as their interests become relevant

As an aside, Paradox mentioned that in a later developer diary, they will look at “how factions can be used to change your empire ethics”, a rather stark claim since the ethics of an empire were fixed. Given how important ethics are for the game-play, this would allow for a more organic development of gameplay, as you incorporate more and more alien civilizations into your empire. This, in turn, will likely lead to some memorable game-play moments where you need to adapt your playstyle depending on how your empire changes.

This variety of play-styles sees further support with the introduction of traditions and unity. These are in essence skills for your empire geared towards different playstyles, namely:

Expansion: Focuses on growth through rapid colonisation.
Domination: Focuses on maintaining control over your population and subjects.
Prosperity: Focuses on economic growth.
Harmony: Focuses on maintaining a happy and diverse population.
Supremacy: Focuses on growth through military conquest.
Purity: Focuses on strength through homogeneity and dominion over other species.
Exploration: Focuses on exploration and scientific discovery.

You can gain those skills by spending unity, a resource you gain “through the construction of government buildings such as monuments, mausoleums, and temples”. Paradox further supports the creation of “tall” empires (where a player chooses to focus on a few highly-upgrade core planets) since “the cost of unlocking a Tradition depends on the size of your empire, as well as how internally stable it is”. Stellaris has long missed out on support for tall empires due to lack of non-expansionist victory options and a lack of balance with regards to the military capabilities of small, highly developed empires versus expansionist powerhouses that attain much larger fleet capacity much earlier, to a degree that is not offset by technological bonuses.

While Banks’ books do indeed describe the internal and diplomatic interactions of empires, a theme of his work is the technological cycle of age-old civilisations ascending to a state of being without corporeal form, and later empires repeating this technological progression. You can imagine that I was quite giddy, when I saw that 1.5 would bring something called Ascension Perks. Those perks are part of the unnamed expansion sold alongside the update and are an improvement to the endgame of Stellaris. Once you complete a tradition tree, you will unlock a perk slot that you can fill with an ability that customises your empire and give you, for example, bonus damage to the game’s mid-game foes, the “Fallen Empires”. Within the perk systems, there are different species endgame paths, which Anward describes as such:

  • The Biological Path focuses on mastery over biological evolution. The first level of it gives access to more gene points and significantly cuts the cost of gene-modding projects, while the second level expands the options available during gene-modding in addition to further providing more points and less cost.
  • The Psionic Path focuses on developing the psionic potential of your population. The first level unlocks new psionic technologies and benefits, while the second level allows your empire to reach a higher level of existence and communicate with the beings present there.
  • The Synthetic Path focuses on the replacement of biology with machinery. The first level allows you to turn your population partly synthetic through the use of cybernetics, while the second level replaces your biological pops with robots, turning your empire entirely synthetic.

ascension perks

I am very excited about the changes the Banks update brings. While I enjoy creating space empires (or space democracies) to conquer my galactic neighbours, the game does get stale in the mid- to late game, when you just find yourself producing the ever same ships and head towards a cascading win. The coming update will add granularity to the internal workings of my empire – it might even lead to me trying my hand at playing a peaceful space-UN to experience all the internal ethics gameplay.

What do you think? With the new updates, Stellaris becomes increasingly binge-able – will you pick it up for another whirl?

Let your voice be heard! Submit your own article to Imperium News here!

Would you like to join the Imperium News staff? Find out how!

Comments

  • Ryan

    Banks is looking like a seriously exciting update. Today’s stuff on ascension perks looks neat, and I hope that it will lead to things like building your own ringworlds.Stellaris’ endgame definitely needs some fleshing out, and this is a good step forward.

    January 13, 2017 at 9:07 AM
  • PewPew

    I think Stellaris has a huge flaw which is that it is a 4x game. It’s always “get more resources to get more ships to get more territory to get more resources.”

    CK2 and EU4 are really more story generators than 4x games and, for me, that puts them in a different league. Stellaris only has one story with different characters each time it is told.

    January 13, 2017 at 8:21 PM
  • Libluini

    Hopefully we also get some neat portraits linked with the new ascension-perks. When I purge the flesh from my empire, it would be lame to just have the same portraits afterwards. (Of course it would be lame AND stupid if they just replace the portraits with those weird humanoid robot pictures they use for synthetics. I mean what the hell guys? If I’m playing giant molluscuid monsters they sure as hell won’t replace themselves with those spindly things.)

    January 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM